CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures Tool. File 1: CSAT_GPRA Client Outcome Measures File 2: CSAT_GPRA Client Outcome. HIV Open Data Project: CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Performance and Results Act (GPRA) to report program outcomes as a. HIV Open Data Project: CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs. United States Department Of Health And Human Services.

Author: Kazilrajas Gardatilar
Country: Eritrea
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 26 March 2006
Pages: 408
PDF File Size: 4.38 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.24 Mb
ISBN: 160-7-14579-443-9
Downloads: 85098
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: JoJobei

Depending on the type of pdf printer you are using, you gprs also change the default security settings. This article was subject to blind, independent, expert peer review.

Although CSAT and other performance efforts require contact with all clients regardless of discharge reason, this first phase of developing a quality assurance system was confined only to those who completed the residential treatment plan.

Table 6 Need for additional treatment services since graduating.

This article has been corrected. Any incomplete surveys were marked as missing data. What are your priorities right now? This bed facility enrolls an average of 43 individuals each month. Footnotes Author Contributions Questionnaire design: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.

Journal of evidence-based social work. The authors gratefully acknowledge the staff at Narconon of Oklahoma and Narconon International for project support.

A Simplified Method for Routine Outcome Monitoring after Drug Abuse Treatment

The outcome instrument The outcome questionnaire, presented in Figure 1was developed by isolating core questions from the item GPRA CSAT treatment outcome module 5 and including those that addressed key recovery goals additional to cessation of substance use: This module is designed to help prevent relapse by training the individual to recognize the characteristics of two distinct types of personalities—the social personality and the antisocial personality—and the ways that relationships with each type affect individual success, survival, drug use, or criminality.

The final survey consists of six items directed at self-reported drug and alcohol use in the past 30 days, two items directed at general drug use since leaving treatment, five hpra directed at quality of life issues in the past 30 days, one gpraa inquiring about use of other treatment services, fsat items inquiring about living conditions and one item inquiring about general health status.

  EN 13757-4 PDF

Staff and client keep signed copies of the plan, which includes follow-up telephone calls at these intervals: The Minnesota Department of Human Csaf is required by statute to collect sufficient information to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of treatment for chemical dependency. Changing Conditions in Life Course: A separate analysis of the relative-only sub sample showed a similar but somewhat attenuated pattern.

Is anyone in your family or someone close to you on active duty in the armed forces, in the reserves, or in the national guard or separated or retired from the armed forces, reserves, or. Articles from Substance Abuse: During each follow-up call the specialist discusses progress or obstacles regarding each of the goals defined in the discharge plan. Coordination with follow-up staff, follow-up process feedback, staff and resource requirements: Collecting complete locator information at intake including home, business and cell phone numbers, email address and street address.

Construct validation of the drug problem items Construct validity is tested by the extent to which similar, yet distinct, measures of treatment effectiveness give consistent answers.

Continuing care and long-term substance use outcomes in managed care: Laudet AB, White W. Outcomes monitoring also has application in the corporate setting, as a tool that Fortune companies with large Employee Assistance Program EAP vendors eg, Caterpillar, Archer Daniels Midland, and ConocoPhillips can use for selecting treatment and prevention programs. The previous gprs was: To find this information, go to section b of the csatgpra tool.

Csat gpra client outcome measures for discretionary programs revised For example, in the California Treatment Outcome Project CalTOP implemented a center, staff-based pilot project with a sophisticated client-tracking database to collect client information at enrollment, 3-months and 9-months post enrollment.

  KYBERNETIK UND REVOLTE PDF

A Simplified Method for Routine Outcome Monitoring after Drug Abuse Treatment

Most grants already include intake items from this list appropriate to their goals and population. If you locate a client for the 6month gpra followup 9 or 10 months after the.

The program is characterized by a lower ratio of staff to participants, more hours of staff contact time and close monitoring of treatment implementation protocols, characteristics common to programs with better retention and engagement in treatment. Obtaining the same contact information for up to three relatives or close associates who do not live with the client but who the client states would know about their treatment and are supportive of their recovery.

A randomized trial of extended telephone-based continuing care for alcohol dependence: After the third sample period, collateral correlation was analyzed see results section and it was determined that the graduate data was reliable. The re-entry plan is developed by: The primary objective of any ROM system is to provide an ongoing trail of long-term outcome data with which to assess any changes in treatment outcomes that might reflect changes in quality or therapy drift. Ups and Downs in Life Course: The lab versus the clinic.

HIV Open Data Project: CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs

Treatment csat to provide guidance to program leaders like you on how to use your programs data fsat assess your clients mental health needs and outcomes. Construct validity is tested by the extent to which similar, yet distinct, measures of treatment effectiveness give consistent answers.

A practical system for monitoring the outcomes of substance use disorder patients.